Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Frictional Losses of Radial Shaft Seals for Industrial Gearbox
Theoretical and Experimental Study
of the Frictional Losses of Radial
Shaft Seals for Industrial Gearbox
Michel Organisciak, Pieter Baart, Stellario Barbera,
Alex Paykin and Matthew Schweig
The improvement of the energy efficiency of industrial gear motors and gearboxes is a
common problem for many gear unit manufacturers and end-users. As is typical of other
mechanical components, the radial lip seals used in such units generate friction and heat,
thus contributing to energy losses of mechanical systems. There exist today simulation
tools that are already helping improve the efficiency of mechanical systems — but accurate
models for seal frictional losses need to be developed. In this paper SKF presents an
engineering model for radial lip seal friction based on a physical approach.
Introduction
Industrial gear units are widely used in power transmission
systems. They are composed of shafts, gears, rolling elements
bearings and dynamic lip seals. The performance of the seals
is critical for the proper functioning of the system. The primary
functions of the seals are to prevent the leakage of oil
to the environment and to avoid the ingress of water or other
contaminants into the mechanical system. Both can lead to
a premature failure of the gear unit. In addition, the seals influence
the system by generating friction and heat. The heat
generated by the friction of the seals has an impact on the
operational temperature of the gear unit as well as on the
viscosity of the lubricant inside the unit. Moreover the seals
contribute to the total energy losses of the mechanical system.
The improvement of the energy efficiency of industrial gear
motors and gearboxes is a common challenge for OEMs and
end-users. For instance energy efficiency classes are defined
for electrical motors and gear motors. Moreover the power
losses of gear units and seals can impact the total energy bill
of an industrial installation. Therefore understanding seal
friction generation and reducing it are essential challenges
for seal manufacturers.
Simulation tools are commonly used to design mechanical
components and systems. For the prediction of specific
parameters like seal temperature or friction torque, specific
models and calculation tools need to be developed. In this
paper SKF presents an engineering model for the prediction
of radial lip seal friction based on a physical approach. The
friction model includes the generation of friction due to rubber
dynamic deformation and lubricant viscous shear between
the surfaces of a seal and a shaft. The friction model
is coupled with a heat generation and seal thermal model.
Indeed, seal friction and seal temperature are closely related:
the heat generated in the sealing lip is conducted through
the seal and shaft and dissipated into the environment. This
changes for instance the lubricant viscosity.
The model is verified step by step in an extensive experimental
study. Measurements of seal friction, seal temperature
and lubricant film thickness have been performed for
various dynamic lip seals. The analyzed parameters are: surface
speed, oil viscosity, seal material, seal size, seal lip style
and duty cycles. The correlation between model predictions
and experimental friction measurements can therefore be
verified.
This unique modelling capability allows selecting or developing
shaft seals which would meet and exceed the demands
of modern gearbox applications. It also enables gearbox
manufacturers to bring to the market better performing and
more reliable gearboxes.
Seal Friction Modeling
Physical phenomena influencing seal friction. The friction
force, FT, is the force resisting the relative motion of two bodies
when a normal force, FN, is applied to the contact between
these bodies. The coefficient of friction, μ, can be defined as:
The coefficient of friction is not constant for radial shaft
seals, which makes the prediction of seal frictional torque
much more complicated. This has been demonstrated in
various studies. Plath (Ref. 1) in 2005 developed a seal friction
model based on finite element analysis. They assumed
initially a constant coefficient of friction for the seal-shaft
contact. However this led to inaccurate results and they demonstrated
that it was necessary to take into account the variation
of temperature of the seal due to the generated frictional
heat to accurately predict seal friction.
More recently, the studies from Haas (Refs. 2–3) have revealed
the influence of surface roughness and of the duty
parameter G (representing the lubricant viscosity, angular
speed and contact pressure) on the friction coefficient. Their
papers show that the friction coefficient follows a Stribecklike
curve (Fig. 1). A transition between mixed and fully lubricated
regime is clearly shown in the evolution of the friction
coefficient.
Figure 1 Stribeck curve: coefficient of friction as a function of
contact speed and lubricant viscosity.
The variations of coefficient of friction in a radial lip seal
contact can be attributed to three phenomena:
The details of their calculation are described (Ref. 10); this
method was used by all four bearings of the gears to determine
the bearing power loss.
The variation of lubricant viscosity as a function of
temperature. Typical curves for standard gearbox oils are
shown (Fig. 2).
Figure 2 Lubricant viscosity as a function of temperature for VG32, VG68 and VG220 oils.
The variation of the coefficient of friction between
rubber and steel. As shown by Grosch (Ref. 4)
and Hermann (Ref. 5), the
coefficient of friction varies
significantly — between 0.1 and 3
in extreme cases — as a function
of temperature, sliding speed and
pressure in dry and lubricated
conditions. This is due to the fact
that for rubbery material, friction
is essentially governed by the
dissipation of energy during the
dynamic deformation of the rubbery
material on the counter-face.
The variation of rubber modulus
with temperature. A typical curve
is shown in Figure 3. The prediction
of seal friction is a complex task
and requires a model being able
to predict the temperature in the
seal and in the contact and to take
into account the variations mentioned in the previous
paragraph.
Figure 3 Modulus as a function of temperature of a typical NBR
material.
Friction model. The friction between the seal and shaft is
considered to be generated by two main governing phenomena:
Lubricant viscous shearing. This takes place in the
contact between the lip and the shaft surface. The
frictional force produced in this manner is defined as Flub.
Viscoelastic losses. This is due to dissipation in the
rubber as its surface is dynamically deformed by the shaft
roughness asperities. The frictional force generated by the
rubber material is referred as Fmaterial.
Taking both these effects into account, the total frictional
torque TTorque can be expressed as:
[advertisement]
Where TTorque is seal frictional torque Nm Flub is seal lip force N
Fmaterial is contribution of the material to the seal frictional
force N Dshaft is shaft diameter m
The material contribution is calculated following the relation
below:
Where
μdry is the coefficient of friction between the rubber and steel
surfaceWhere Ftip is seal lip force N f is a function of given variables
Ac is real contact area at the surface roughness level, which
is calculated from contact mechanics, m2
The lubricant contribution can be written as:
Where
η is lubricant viscosity in the contact, Pas u is surface speed, m/s he is effective film thickness depending on the lip tip style
(i.e., wave or plain), m Scontact is surface area where the lubricant is sheared, m,sup>2
The effective film thickness is based on elastohydrodynamic
lubrication theory (Ref. 6) and can be written as:
The combination of these equations allows the calculation
of the seal friction torque at any given speed and temperature.
Thermal dissipation model. The friction between a rotating
shaft and a seal lip generates heat that is dissipated by the
different components of the system. The power dissipated
qdisp by the sliding contact can be written as:
Where
qdisp is power dissipated in the sealing contact, W.
The generated heat flux in the seal/shaft contact is integrated
into the heat conservation equation for the lip contact.
The heat is then diffused in the shaft and seal according to the
energy equation:
Where
ρ is material density kg/m3 CP is heat capacity, J/K k is heat conductivity, W/(mK) T is temperature, K t is time, s
The complete computational algorithm is indicated in Figure
4. Here, the friction model is combined with the thermal
model. The effects of temperature change on lip force and oil
viscosity are also included. The algorithm is transient, allowing
computations for different speed cycles.
Experimental Techniques Used for Model
Validation
The validation of the model is conducted for three parameters:
Lubricant film thickness in the contact (to validate Eq. 5)
Frictional torque
Seal temperature
Figure 4 Calculation algorithm.
Film thickness measurements. The measurement of an
absolute value of film thickness in the sealing contact has always
been a challenge. For instance in 1992, Poll and Gabelli
(Ref. 7) developed a method where they use magnetic fluid
as a lubricant and measure the magnetic resistance through
the lubricant film in the sealing contact. In the same period,
Poll (Ref. 8) used the fluorescent technique: a fluorescent dye
is added to the oil and is excited with a laser. The intensity of
the light can be related to the film thickness in the contact.
However, both techniques require complex calibration and
specific equipment.
In this work, a capacitance technique using the SKF Lubcheck
set-up is applied to measure the evolutions of lubricant
film thickness in a radial lip seal/shaft contact. Seals molded
from a special conductive rubber compound have to be used
to realize the experiments. This compound is part of the SKF
compound portfolio and has similar mechanical proprieties
as standard sealing materials.
Figure 5 Electrical schematic for Lubcheck measurement.
Figure 5 shows the electric schematic of the measurement
system. Vmx is the maximum voltage applied to the system;
Cref is a reference capacitance added to the system; Cm is the
capacitance of the sealing contact; and Rm is the electrical
resistance of the seal itself. After calibration using lubricants
with different viscosities and simultaneous friction torque
measurements, the measured voltage Vcap can be related to
the capacitance of the sealing contact and therefore to the lubricant
film thickness. The system is implemented on the test
rig shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6 Seal friction measurement test rig.
Friction torque and seal temperature measurement. Seal
friction measurements are performed on a specialized SKF
test rig (Fig. 6). The shaft is driven by an electrical motor allowing
a very wide, programmable, range of rotational speed.
The central part of the test rig is the air bearing spindle, onto
which the stationary seal specimen is mounted and the friction
torque sensing unit is connected. The air bearing ensures
that the measured friction is only due to the seal. The seal is
lubricated with an oil bath and different oil sump volumes
are possible.
In addition to the frictional torque, seal temperature is constantly
recorded during the tests. Thermal measurements are
made using a thermocouple placed in the spring groove of the seal. The analysis of temperature
changes is used in combination with
frictional torque to validate the model.
Model Validation: Correlation
Between the Model and
Experimental Results
Film thickness. Using the set-up described
earlier, the film thickness is
measured for a seal with different oils
having different viscosities and for different
rotating speeds. Figure 7 shows
the film thickness as a function of the
product sliding speed u times lubricant
viscosity η at the running temperature. The results can be fitted
with a power law function:
Figure 7 Measured film thickness for different oils with different viscosities
and sliding speeds (points). Power fit of the experimental results (in
black) and prediction by Equation 5 (in red).
The result from Equation 5 used in the model is added to
the figure (in red). Equation 5 assumes a power 0.66 applied
to the product (u η), which is very close to the numerical fit
(Eq. 8). This shows a very good agreement qualitative between
the theoretical formula and the measured film thickness,
validating the approach in the model.
Model validation: seal friction and temperature. Measurements
and seal friction and temperature calculations are
performed for molded wave seals and trimmed plain lip seals
(HMS 5 RG and V seals; Fig. 8). The two seal types are standard
seals used in industrial applications, such as in gearboxes.
Figure 8 Typical cross-section of a trimmed plain lip HMS5 seal.
A typical example of experimental results and model predictions
is shown in Figure 9. The graph on the left displays
the used speed cycle, with different steps of speed between
10 and 1,000 rpm. The graph in the middle displays the predicted
and measured frictional torque. The graph on the
right shows the predicted and measured garter spring groove
temperature, with additionally the predicted temperature in
the contact. The graphs show that the model predictions are
close to the measured friction and temperature.
Figure 9 Speed cycle (left), friction torque (middle) and temperature (left) for a typical study case. Measurements are displayed with thin lines. Model
predictions are displayed with bold red lines. The dashed line in the temperature plot (right) is the predicted contact temperature.
An extensive number of test conditions,
different compounds (NBR and
FKM) and lubricants have been used to
validate the model. The left graph in Figure
10 depicts the correlation between
the model predictions and the measurements
for all tests for molded wave seals.
The right graph in Figure 10 depicts the
correlation for trimmed plain lip seals.
For the purposes of the comparison,
only the average friction obtained in the
last 30 seconds at the end of each speed
step is considered. The correlation plot
shows that all the predictions are within
20% of the measurements results. The resulting correlation is
high, showing an R2 value of more than 95%.
Figure 10 Predicted friction torque as a function of the measured friction torque for wave seals (left) and
plain seals (right). The red dashed lines represent the interval at ± 20%.
With the very good correlations for the film thickness, frictional
torque and seal temperature, we can conclude that the
developed approach is validated and can be used for the prediction
of seal frictional torque in an application.
Applications of the Model
Comparison between molded wave and trimmed plain
lips seals. The model presented in this paper can be applied
to trimmed plain lip seals or to molded wave seals (Ref. 9).
As shown in Figure 11, the wave seal has a special sinusoidal
contact patch on the running counter face. This enables
a better lubricant flow at the vicinity of the lip and a higher
lubricant film in the contact. This also enables a better heat
exchange between the lip and shaft.
Figure 11 Difference of the contact patch between a plain seal (left) and
a wave seal (right).
In order to study the difference between plain and wave
seals, seals with the same cross-section and material are used
for the experimental study. Seal friction and temperature are
calculated in parallel with the model described in this paper.
Figure 12 represents an example of the results for the speed
cycle displayed in Figure 9. There is a clear difference in the
friction between the two lip geometries. The wave lip reduces
by about 20% the frictional torque during the tests. The friction
reduction has a direct influence on the temperature, with
a self-induced temperature decreasing by more than 10°C.
Figure 12 further illustrates the good match between the
measured values of frictional torque and temperature and the
model predictions, thus confirming the quality of the model.
This also enables the usage of this approach
to predict the seal torque and
temperature in a mechanical system.
Figure 12 Friction torque (left) and temperature (right) measurements as a function of time for a wave seal
(blue) and plain (red) seal. The thin lines are measurements; the thick lines are model predictions.
Influence of oil sump volume on
seal friction. The volume of oil in a
gear unit can vary for different applications.
It influences the friction
of different mechanical components
and the temperature of the mechanical
system. The model is used in order
to study the influence of the oil
sump volume on seal temperature
and seal friction. The volume of oil
has an impact on the dissipation of
the heat generated in the sealing contact and therefore on the
friction and temperature of the seal.
Seal friction measurements are also carried out with an oil
sump of a volume 0.2 and 3 liters but maintaining the same oil
level relative to the center of the shaft. The results of the model
and of the measurements are displayed (Fig. 13). First they
show a very good agreement between the model and the measurements.
Secondly, both the model and the experiments
confirm that the oil sump volume has an influence on the
frictional losses. A system with more oil has a lower operating
temperature because it is able to better dissipate the heat from
the sealing contact. Consequently, the oil viscosity is higher,
which results in a higher friction. Therefore it is very difficult
to give an absolute value of seal friction in operations since it is highly dependent on the environment
in which the seal operates. Only a combined
seal frictional and thermal model
is able to predict seal friction and frictional
losses in an application.
Figure 13 Measured (dotted line) and predicted (solid line) frictional torque (left) and seal temperature
(right) for a 0.2 L oil sump (blue) and 3 L oil sump (red).
General Conclusion
The paper has presented a physical
model to analyze and predict frictional
torque and temperature of radial lip
seals with a plain or wave lip geometry.
A good correlation between experimental
and theoretical results has been
obtained. It has been shown that the
reduction of friction has a direct effect
on the self-induced temperature in the
seal. Lowering seal friction decreases the operating temperature
which in its turn can have a positive impact on other performance
parameters such as material life and lubricant life.
The results have also shown the importance of considering
the effect of operating conditions and temperature in the prediction
of seal frictional torque in any environment and system.
The heat induced by the friction of the sealing contact
needs to be dissipated in the other elements of the mechanical
system. Therefore the real operating temperature and frictional
losses of a seal can only be accurately predicted if the
friction model is coupled to a heat generation and heat dissipation
model. This modelling approach is complementary to
the simulation techniques for a complete gear unit presented
by Wemekamp (Ref. 10).
Michel Organisciak is the project manager in the
Sealing & Polymers department at the SKF Engineering
and Research Center in Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
He joined SKF in 2007 as a research engineer in sealing,
focusing on development of modeling techniques and
simulation tools for seal dynamic behavior, seal friction
and seal life. More recently, Organisciak has been working
on the development of innovative sealing concepts.
Pieter Baart is senior researcher at SKF Engineering and
Research Center, Testing Technology Department. He
is responsible for experimental research in the fields of
grease lubrication, greased bearing friction and sealing
and for the development of new measurement and testing
methods. Pieter is working at SKF since 2007. He obtained
his Ph.D. degree at Lulea University of Technology on the
subject “Grease lubrication mechanisms in bearing seals”
in 2011. He obtained his M.Sc. mechanical engineering
degree, with a specialization in tribology, at Delft University of Technology in
the Netherlands in 2007.
Stellario Barbera holds a MsC in solid state physical chemistry from
Universita’ degli Studi di Torino (Italy). From 1996 to 2008 he was employed
at the SKF manufacturing plant in Villanova d’Asti (Italy), while charged with
various responsibilities. Since 2008 Barbera has been at the corporate research
center in The Netherlands (ERC) and is now department manager for Sealing &
Polymers, coordinating the research and innovation activities for seals.
Alex Paykin is responsible for the global development team for industrial
rotating lip seals in SKF Sealing Solutions. He joined SKF Sealing Solutions
in 1985, working in various positions including application engineering,
advanced manufacturing and product development. Paykin has spent the last
five years in support of all research activities at Sealing Solutions — including
simulation tool development at the SKF Engineering and Research Center in
the Netherlands.
Matthew Schweig is involved in global research and the advanced
development of rotating lip seals at SKF Sealing Solutions. He joined SKF
Sealing Solutions in 2005 as a product development engineer. In the last few
years Schweig has supported all R&D activities at Sealing Solutions, including
performance simulation tools development at the SKF Engineering and
Research Center in the Netherlands.
In conclusion, the approach can therefore be used confidently
to:
Predict the seal friction in an application
Optimize seal design by acting on the parameters
influencing the friction and prediction the final outcome
Together with other SKF simulation tools, analyze the
performance of the seal in the application
These unique modelling capabilities will allow selecting
and developing shaft seals which would meet and exceed the
demands of modern gearbox applications. They enable also
the design of better performing and more reliable gear units.
Acknowledgment. The authors would like to thank Alexander
de Vries, director SKF Group product development, for his
support and his authorization to publish this work
References:
Plath, S., S. Meyer and V.M. Wollesen. “Friction Torque of a Rotary Shaft
Lip-Type Seal: A Comparison Between Test Results and FE Simulation,”
ISSN 1392-1207, MECHANIKA, Nr.4 (54), 2005.
Jung, S. and W. Haas. “Effects of Shaft Surface Topography on the
Friction of Radial Lip Seals,” 65th STLE Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, USA,
May 16-20, 2010.
Narten, M. and W. Haas. “Low-Viscosity Grease Lubricated Radial Lip
Seals - Influence of the Lubricant,” 66th STLE Annual Meeting, Atlanta,
USA, May 15-19, 2011.
Grosch, K.A. “The Relation Between the Friction and Viscoelastic
Properties of Rubber,” Proc. Roy. Soc., S. A, 274, S. 21-39, 1963.
Hermann, A. and T. Dabisch. “Influence on tribological behavior of
pneumatic actuators due to modifications of polymer compounds,”
Proceedings of the 15th International Sealing Conference, Stuttgart,
Germany, Oct. 7-8, 2008.
Lugt, P.M. and G.E. Morales-Espejel. “A Review of Elastohydrodynamic
Lubrication Theory,” Trib. Trans., Vol. 54, pp. 470-496, 2011.
Poll, G. and A. Gabelli. “Formation of Lubricant Film in Rotary Sealing
Contacts: Part 2: A New Measuring Principle for Lubricant Film
Thickness,” Trans. ASME J. Tribol., 114, 290-297, 1992.
Poll, G., A. Gabelli, P.G. Binnington and J. Qu. “Dynamic Mapping of
Rotary Lip Seal Lubricant Films by Fluorescent Image Processing,”
Proceedings 13th International Conference on Fluid Sealing, B.S. Nau,
ed., BHRA, 1992.
Web link: http://www.skf.com/uk/news-and-media/newssearch/
2013-07-11.html.
Wemekamp, B., A. Doyer and G.E. Morales-Espejel. “Friction Theory,
Thermal Modelling and Validation for Industrial Gearbox,” Proceedings
of the VDI International Conference on Gears, Munchen, Oct 7-9, 2013.