We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
I was invited by Tom Astrene of TLT to write a response to the
July 2010 TLT article (Ref. 1). My rebuttal — “In Search of a Fatigue
Limit: A Critique of ISO Standard 281:2007” — was published
in Tribology and Lubrication Engineering, TLT, August
2010 edition (Ref. 10). While this article is also available online,
I will attempt to summarize the essence of my response.
For a 5-megawatt wind turbine prototype,
aerodyn employs the latest control and software technologies, including a comprehensive PC-based control solution and the new modular TwinCAT Wind Framework. The TwinCAT Wind Framework features the latest software engineering and Big Data applications to extend current Industry 4.0 concepts to the wind energy industry. The modular software supports, for example, the direct provision of sensor data to the operator’s database, and in general enables the easy adaption of the wind turbine operation management to future requirements.
Engineers typically learn that the bearing L10 life can be estimated using the so called “C/P method” — or the “basic rating life” of
the bearing, a method rooted in the 1940s. Major developments have since led to the “modified rating life,” released in ISO 281:2007,
which includes the aiso life modification factor. In this paper a succession of equations used for bearing life ratings are reviewed, and
current bearing life rating practices are discussed in detail. It is shown that — despite the introduction more than 30 years ago of
the adjustment factor of the basic rating life, and the standardization in 2007 of the aiso modification factor — use of these improved
calculation methods are not practiced by all engineers. Indeed — many continue referring to the old model as a way of seeking
compliance with existing, established practices.
It seems preposterous in the whimsical, wireless world of today, but in 1977 cinema’s greatest visioneers came together and decided the pinnacle of robotic technology in the future would be a motorized trash can.