We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
In recent years the estimation of gearbox power loss is attracting more interest — especially in the wind turbine and automotive gearbox industry — but also in industrial gearboxes where heat dissipation is a consideration as well. As new transmissions concepts are being researched to meet both ecological and commercial demands, a quick and reliable estimation of overall efficiency becomes inevitable in designing the optimal gearbox.
After a sluggish 2013, annual installations of new wind turbines grew by 44% in 2014, according to the Global Wind Energy Council. And while much of that growth has been in Asia— particularly China, which now leads the world with 114 GW of installed capacity—the USA, Europe, and the rest of the world expect steady growth for the next couple of years as well (Fig. 1).
Engineers typically learn that the bearing L10 life can be estimated using the so called “C/P method” — or the “basic rating life” of
the bearing, a method rooted in the 1940s. Major developments have since led to the “modified rating life,” released in ISO 281:2007,
which includes the aiso life modification factor. In this paper a succession of equations used for bearing life ratings are reviewed, and
current bearing life rating practices are discussed in detail. It is shown that — despite the introduction more than 30 years ago of
the adjustment factor of the basic rating life, and the standardization in 2007 of the aiso modification factor — use of these improved
calculation methods are not practiced by all engineers. Indeed — many continue referring to the old model as a way of seeking
compliance with existing, established practices.
Engineers are often challenged with the seemingly
impossible task of doing more with less.
Customers want more power transmitted in a smaller space,
they want more efficient designs, and, of course, they want to
spend less money. So engineers are always looking for ways
to squeeze the most out of their mechanical systems. They’re
constantly working to maximize power density, increase
energy efficiency and reduce costs to meet their customers’
needs.
It seems preposterous in the whimsical, wireless world of today, but in 1977 cinema’s greatest visioneers came together and decided the pinnacle of robotic technology in the future would be a motorized trash can.